Thursday, September 09, 2010     Login  Register Now!
RELATED ARTICLES

Features

Passage in AP World History Textbook Perceived as Defamatory towards Jews
Published Friday, February 26, 2010


The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) sent a letter to Principal Bill Gregory, stating that a passage in Sherwood’s AP World history textbook, "The Earth and Its Peoples", 2nd edition, is defamatory towards Jewish people. The passage, concerning Jesus’ life and crucifixion, states in part:

Offended by what he perceived as Jewish religious and political leaders’ excessive concern with money and power and by the perfunctory nature of mainstream Jewish religious practice in his time, Jesus prescribed a return to the personal faith and spirituality of an earlier age. He eventually attracted the attention of the Jewish authorities in Jerusalem, who regarded popular reformers as potential troublemakers.

"This section replaces historical facts with stereotypes," says Emily Friedman, a representative from the ADL. "There is no factual basis for this type of statement." The ADL confirms that they "became aware" of the situation from an outside complaint about the passage.

When the social studies department was notified of the ADL’s concerns, teachers discussed possible causes of action. "World teachers have debated the historical accuracy of the quote, and we were thinking we could use the passage as a teachable moment," explains social studies resource teacher Joe Sangillo. "We would point out the passage and say, ‘Hey, this is debatable, what are the different sides? Let’s interpret this.’ That’s one option. Another would be to get white stickers and cover the passage in each book. Another option was to replace the textbooks all together. We chose the third because they needed to be replaced anyways; they were old textbooks. The letter from the ADL pushed us along, but we were already headed toward buying new textbooks." Gregory ultimately approved the decision to purchase a new textbook called "World Civilizations: The Global Experience", which AP World students have switched to using for the second semester.

Regardless of whether or not a new textbook were to be purchased, this issue still presents material for class discussion on the history of Jews. "We try to teach a balanced view of history," says AP World teacher Michelle Games. "We cover the persecution of Jews throughout history."

An aspect of the AP World curriculum involves teaching historiography, which is the study of how history is researched and analyzed. Although there are various different ways of looking at history, and though facts are concrete, opinions on such facts can be drastically different. "[Historiography] is one of the parts of the AP curriculum that the College Board requires us to have in the first place, so [the passage gives us] a good opportunity to talk about it," says AP World teacher Todd Rubenstein.

Games agrees that history entails explaining different interpretations of the story. "History is from the perspective of the writer; it’s not a defined law. Different people introduce subjects differently. As a teacher you always have to do critical examinations [of the subject]," she says.

In this instance, both Games and Rubinstein feel that the passage is talking about Jesus’ perspective towards the Jewish leaders of the community, not the Jewish people as a whole. "[The source] is pretty clear that it says the religious leaders. The leaders of any community can be obsessed with money and power. If it had said that the Jewish people were having too many money and power issues, then that would be a very different story. And being Jewish myself, I was not offended at all by this. And, in fact, that’s pretty much the historically accepted explanation," says Rubinstein.

The ADL’s Friedman disagrees. "I think the important thing to note is that what is in a textbook needs to be factually correct, so our students are learning history, not a classic form of anti-Semitism that has caused so much damage in history."
 
 
A Cantor's Perspective:

Rosalie Boxt, a cantor from Temple Emanuel in Kensington, gives her perspective on how the ideas conveyed in the passage have led to some blaming of the Jews for the death of Jesus.

While the passage itself accurately represents the New Testament telling of how events transpired during the time of Jesus, and the nature of the struggles the Jewish community was facing at the time within the Roman Empire, it is also true that this idea has single-handedly created centuries of hatred for Jews for what became a minimalistic reading of this event, which was in essence that ‘the Jews killed Jesus" because they did indeed ask Pontius Pilate to find a way to prevent Jesus from creating more tension in the Jewish community. Not only were there many sects of Judaism at that time, and the Jewish leadership was struggling with many uprisings and unrest, but it’s also unclear that the Jews actually wanted Jesus "killed." We have to imagine they did not.

The Jewish community in Israel at the time was not independent. They were part of the Roman Empire, and as such they were allowed to live within Roman controlled Jerusalem only as long as they were able to keep their "Jews" controlled and quiet, so that the Roman rulers could rule in peace. So the smaller groups, many of them with differing views as to how Judaism should be practiced and lived, and who began to foster dissent among the Jewish population of Jerusalem, made the Jewish leadership nervous, as it did Pontius Pilate and Roman leadership. So the situation in which the Romans put the Jewish leadership to keep its large, diverse population "controlled" created their anxiety around Jesus and the movement he was fostering.

For centuries, Jewish communities have been burned, destroyed, Jews killed and tortured all in the name of having (centuries after those Jewish leaders and Pontius Pilate lived) "killed Jesus". Ultimately, the Roman leadership wanted all of their people, and particularly the Jews to remain quiet servants of their rule, so Jesus was not a leader they wanted to encourage either.

But the ADL’s concern is a valid one—continuing to perpetuate the myth that "the Jews" as a collective, killed [Jesus]. Many thoughtful people can of course recognize that there were Jews and Romans at the time involved in the course of events that led to Jesus’ crucifixion, [but] that ... Jews are not responsible for the death of Jesus. But unfortunately, passages like these open the door to people who are unable or unwilling to see the nuance, to have an accurate sense of the history and the complicated nature of Jerusalem at that time. And we have the proof or centuries of history to hold up as examples of the fact that these kinds of sentences have given non-Jewish communities permission to persecute Jews, in hateful, murderous, and persecutory ways. And it survives today.


COMMENTS
POST A COMMENT
0 Comments | View All
You must Login to leave a comment.